01 / 10
Download PDF
InvestHouse Research
Research subjectSky Metals LtdSKY:ASX
Report cycleQ1 FY26 UPDATEAs at 22 Oct 2026
Report01/ 10

Re-rate on a bigger Tallebung MRE — H1 2026 resource update

This is a binary development trade, not an explorer story.

The equity story

This is a binary development trade, not an explorer story.

Where value comes from

The fastest route to cash flow runs through Tallebung. Sky is drilling for an updated resource, then using ore sorting, gravity and flotation work to prove it can lift head grade and cut the amount of rock that has to be processed. That matters because lower tonnes through the plant means lower capex, lower operating cost and a cleaner path to a small open-pit tin mine.

What has to happen

  • H1 2026 updated Tallebung MRE, plus ongoing assay releases -> this is the next hard valuation event, and it must show scale and continuity, not just more drill hits.
  • Ore sorting and downstream metallurgy need to hold up at representative scale -> if recoveries and concentrate quality stay strong, the project can support a smaller, cheaper plant and a better economics case.
  • SSD and EIS work must keep moving in parallel -> a clearer approvals path shortens the pre-revenue period and reduces the chance the market prices in another long delay.

The call weakens if the milestones above are delayed, fail to produce decision-grade evidence, or require materially more capital than the report assumes.

Verified and compiled byIvan Tchourilov02 Aug 2026

General information only: This report is general in nature and has been prepared without taking into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Consider whether it is appropriate for you and seek licensed advice where required.

This report has not been commissioned or paid for by the company and may be AI-assisted. See Important Disclosures for publisher, conflicts, research policy and distribution information.

© 2026 InvestHouse Financial Services Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.

Cover · Investment SummaryInvestHouse
Sky Metals LtdResearch ReportInvestHouse Research
SKY : ASXPAGE 02 / 10
Section Lens
02

Macro Backdrop

Macro regime now

Tin is not a broad, passive demand story. It sits at the centre of solder, electronics and industrial packaging, so pricing is driven by manufacturing cycles, inventory restocking and whether buyers need secure supply from politically stable jurisdictions. For developers like SKY, the key macro question is not just the tin price. It is whether the market will fund the work needed to turn a resource into a mineable project.

That funding backdrop is better than the 2022 to 2023 tightening shock, but it is still selective. The rates regime remains restrictive relative to the cheap capital years, and junior mining equity is open only for names that can show a near-term inflection. Capital is available, but it is discriminating. That suits projects with clear technical proof points and punishes stories that keep asking for money without advancing the asset.

The latest market signal matters here. SKY’s 2026-02-12 placement raised A$20.5m at A$0.155 a share, and management framed that capital around drilling, an updated mineral resource estimate, bulk sampling, metallurgical work and approvals. That is the clearest read-through from the broader regime. When investors are willing to back a pre-revenue tin developer, they want visible progress toward a mineable project, not open-ended exploration spend.

Why it matters for this stock

SKY is not trying to win on tin demand alone. It is trying to prove that Tallebung can move from explorer economics to developer economics, with ore sorting, gravity and flotation testwork lowering the amount of rock that has to be processed. If that works at scale, the project needs less plant, less tailings space and less cash per tonne. That is what makes a tin project more fundable in a restrictive capital market.

The market is also underwriting jurisdiction. SKY’s projects sit in New South Wales, a developed mining region with infrastructure and a clearer permitting path than many global tin basins. That matters because capital now favours shorter paths to approval and first cash flow. The company has already initiated the NSW State Significant Development process for Tallebung and appointed an Environmental Manager, so the next step is not just more drilling. It is proof that the approvals path can move without forcing a redesign or a delay that pushes dilution further out.

This is why the stock trades on external liquidity as much as geology. When junior mining markets are open, funding can be pulled forward to accelerate drilling, bulk samples and studies. When they are not, the next raise comes on worse terms. SKY’s latest quarterly shows A$20.60m cash and about 8.8 quarters of runway at A$2.34m net burn per quarter, which helps, but it does not remove the risk of a heavily discounted raise if the updated MRE or study work slips.

The bigger prize is still secondary to the bridge. Tallebung is the project that can reprice the stock first if resource confidence and processing performance hold. Doradilla is the longer-dated second hub, but it only adds value if the market is already willing to fund the flagship. That is the key transmission from the macro regime into the equity: open funding windows support the near-term de-risking work, and de-risking is what gets SKY out of explorer pricing.

What investors should watch

  1. 01Further evidence that junior mining placements stay open, especially for NSW tin names and other pre-revenue developers.
  2. 02Tin price and inventory signals, because buyers fund projects faster when they expect tighter supply and better realised prices.
  3. 03The updated Tallebung MRE in H1 2026, because a larger, higher-confidence resource is what makes the funding story easier to sell.
  4. 04Bulk sampling and metallurgy results, especially whether the reported ore sorting uplift and >98% tin recovery hold at representative scale.
  5. 05Any sign that approvals or baseline studies are slipping, because timeline drift increases the cost of capital.
  6. 06Whether SKY can keep funding drilling and studies without needing a heavily discounted raise before the next technical step lands.

Bottom line: the macro backdrop is open, but not forgiving. SKY wins only if the market keeps funding selective juniors long enough for Tallebung to prove it is more than a resource story.

Macro Backdrop · Section LensInvestHouse
Sky Metals LtdResearch ReportInvestHouse Research
SKY : ASXPAGE 03 / 10
Section Lens
03

Tallebung: the flagship that matters

Lead asset
Developer underwriting anchor
Company stageDeveloper
Current gateFunding, permits and construction execution
Study anchorPFSTallebung Project

The equity story

Sky Metals is trying to move from explorer to developer on one asset first, and Tallebung is the test. If the updated resource, metallurgy and approvals all land, SKY stops trading like a hope stock and starts looking like a tin developer with a defined path to cash flow.

The market still treats it as a small explorer. That is the mispricing. The next 3 to 12 months matter because Tallebung has to prove three things at once, a larger and higher confidence resource, a processing route that cuts the amount of ore that needs handling, and an approvals path that does not drag out the timetable or the spend.

Core value drivers

  1. 01Tallebung drilling, the hole count has expanded from the prior 115-hole MRE base to more than 400 holes in the updated database. That matters because resource size and confidence drive whether the project looks like a mine, not just a geology story.
  2. 02Tallebung metallurgy, bulk sampling of around 70 tonnes reportedly delivered tin grade uplift of 4.6x to 6.6x with more than 98% tin recovery referenced in disclosures. That matters because ore sorting can shrink the plant, cut waste and lower the capital the market has to fund.
  3. 03Tallebung approvals, SKY has initiated the NSW State Significant Development process and appointed a dedicated Environmental Manager. That matters because approvals timing sets the discount rate, and delays keep the stock trapped in pre-revenue valuation.
  4. 04Tallebung by-products, recent drilling continues to show silver and tungsten within broader tin intercepts. That matters because by-product credits can improve project economics if they hold up in the mine plan.

Asset priority and valuation

Tallebung is the only asset that can move SKY first. Doradilla is interesting, but it is still a second hub story and it needs more capital, more drilling and more proof before it can carry the valuation. Tallebung already has the scale of work behind it, the metallurgy is being tested with bulk samples, and the approvals process is underway. That puts it in front of the pack.

This changes valuation now, not just later, because the market can start underwriting a development path instead of just exploration upside. A better MRE in H1 2026, if it shows scale and continuity across the expanded drill database, is the bridge from concept to something the market can model as a mineable tin project. That is the point where SKY can trade more like a developer than an explorer.

Tallebung also has a clearer competitive edge than most peers. Many junior tin stories still need to find a resource, then prove a flowsheet, then start approvals. SKY is already working through all three at once on a shallow, open-pit-amenable tin project in New South Wales. That does not remove risk, but it shortens the line to a financeable package if the results keep holding together.

The failure condition is straightforward. If the updated resource does not show enough continuity, if ore sorting does not scale cleanly, or if approvals slow the timetable materially, the stock stays stuck in pre-production dilution territory. The latest placement gave SKY A$20.5m and 8.8 quarters of runway at the March 2026 burn rate of A$2.34m a quarter, but that only buys time. It does not buy success.

What to watch

  1. 01H1 2026 updated MRE, watch for a clear lift in hole density, confidence and resource shape. No meaningful upgrade, and the stock keeps trading as an explorer.
  2. 02Ore sorting follow-up, look for more representative bulk sample results and variability by ore type. Replicable results support a smaller, cheaper flowsheet.
  3. 03NSW approvals progress, watch for concrete SSD and baseline milestones. Slippage extends the funding clock and raises dilution risk.
  4. 04Drill read-through, focus on continuity, shallow geometry and whether silver and tungsten strengthen the economics. Thin, patchy intercepts do not reset the story.

Bottom line: Tallebung is the asset that can turn SKY into a tin developer with a real funding and development path. If it works, the stock can trade on a bigger, better defined project. If it fails, SKY stays an early-stage cash burn story.

Tallebung: the flagship that matters · Section LensInvestHouse
Sky Metals LtdResearch ReportInvestHouse Research
SKY : ASXPAGE 04 / 10
Section Lens
04

Doradilla and the rest of the portfolio: upside, but not the main game

Lead asset
Developer underwriting anchor
Company stageDeveloper
Current gateFunding, permits and construction execution
Study anchorPFSTallebung Project

Core value drivers

  1. 01Doradilla, potential second tin hub, reported an early flowsheet that produced a saleable cassiterite concentrate, with up to about 78% tin recovery. That matters because it turns a conceptual tin field into a possible second development leg, but only if the testwork holds up on broader ore types.
  2. 02Doradilla’s mineralised corridor now reads as >10 km, based on rock chips and interpretation. That expands the size story, but it does not yet prove a JORC resource or a mineable inventory. The stock only starts to assign real value when drill data converts that corridor into tonnage, grade and continuity.
  3. 03Narriah and the other NSW assets are pipeline options, not near-term value drivers. They matter because they can add future targets, but they should stay capital-light unless fresh drilling shows a clear drill-to-resource path.
  4. 04Capital discipline is the point, because the February 2026 raise was aimed mainly at Tallebung first. That means the portfolio only adds value if it preserves cash for the flagship rather than competing with it.

Asset priority and valuation

Doradilla is the bigger prize on paper, but it is also the more funding-heavy story. The attraction is obvious. Sky has an early metallurgical result, a saleable concentrate, and a corridor that management now describes as more than 10 km long. If that work converts into a first JORC resource, Doradilla becomes a second NSW tin hub and adds real strategic depth to the company. That is the end state here, a multi-asset tin developer with a second development option.

The market is not paying for that end state yet, because the paper value is still built on targets, not mine plans. Doradilla remains an Exploration Target, which is conceptual and not a resource. The next step is dense enough drilling to show continuity, then metallurgy across representative ore types, then a development path that can support a credible mining study. Until those pieces land, the asset is still an option, not a project that can be financed on its own.

This is why Doradilla ranks behind Tallebung. Tallebung is the asset that can move first, because it sits on the critical path to an updated resource, mine studies and approvals. Doradilla only becomes valuation-relevant if it proves it can grow into a second hub without pulling cash away from the flagship. If the company tries to push every asset at once, dilution rises and the market discounts all of it harder.

The right way to read the portfolio is simple. Tallebung is the bridge to value. Doradilla is the scale upside. Narriah and the rest are optionality. That hierarchy matters because Sky is still pre-revenue and funds work through equity markets. The company becomes more investable if it can keep Doradilla advancing while protecting cash for Tallebung’s resource, metallurgy and approvals run.

What to watch

  1. 01Convert target to resource at Doradilla, with enough continuity to support a mineable shape. If that does not happen, the asset stays speculative.
  2. 02Test metallurgy across more representative ore, not just selected composites. If recovery falls away at scale, the whole second-hub case weakens.
  3. 03Watch whether Doradilla spend stays selective, because a broad push across the portfolio would signal capital strain and raise dilution risk.
  4. 04Look for evidence that Tallebung remains the funding priority, since Doradilla only creates value if it is advanced without delaying the flagship path to financeability.

Bottom line: Doradilla is the second leg, but it only matters if Sky can turn it into a real resource without starving Tallebung.

Doradilla and the rest of the portfolio: upside, but not the main game · Section LensInvestHouse
Sky Metals LtdResearch ReportInvestHouse Research
SKY : ASXPAGE 05 / 10
05Decision Variables

Valuation & funding

Can the company fund the next value gate on acceptable terms?

Market Cap
A$159m
Last Price
A$0.160
Cash
A$17.6m
Net Cash
A$17.6m
Development ScorecardDeveloper path: permits → funding → EPC → offtake → construction → commissioning
NowPermits
NextFunding
NextEPC
NowOfftake
NextConstruction
NextCommissioning
Gate
Status
Why it matters
● Permits
In progress
Approvals path to FID
○ Funding
Open
Project finance package
○ EPC
Open
Schedule and capex control
● Offtake
In progress
Product / customer path
○ Construction
Open
Physical de-risking
○ Commissioning
Open
Operating proof / first cash
Capital stackSources for the development path
Source
A$m
Cash
A$17.6m

Expansion beyond Stage may still require project-level or partner capital.

Cash flow inflectionPath to self-funding
2026Current cash burn
2027Commissioning
2027 H2First sales
2028Operating cash flow
2029+Fund Stage
Valuation bridgeFrom study NAV to target PPS
=
Risk-adjusted equity value
A$68.2m
house target case
=
Target
A$0.069
÷ 993m sh
Target disciplineWhy we only recognise that share of value today
Question
Answer
Market metric
target value construction is the anchor; producer multiples are only relevant after production or cash flow evidence.
Where it sits today
A$159m market cap -> A$68.2m target equity (-57%).
Comparator basis
No like-for-like resource peer denominator is available. The resource line is an implied-target reconciliation, not peer validation; it neither proves nor disproves the accepted valuation.
Why not the top case
Target remains below blue-sky A$89.9m / A$0.091. We stop here because the next technical, permitting or operating proof point has not yet landed. Higher credit needs the next technical, permitting or operating proof point.
Binding constraints
the next technical, permitting or operating proof point has not yet landed
Price rangeWhere the equity story lands
PER-SHARE OUTCOME · LOG SCALESPOT A$0.160TARGETA$0.069
A$68.2m equity value
BLUE SKYA$0.091
A$89.9m equity value
Market snapshot A$0.160 · uplift vs point-in-time quote
Scenario
Price / sh
Equity
vs Snapshot
Target
A$0.069
A$68.2m
-57%
Blue sky
A$0.091
A$89.9m
-43%

Market discount drivers: funding, execution, commodity.

Development ScorecardDeveloper path: permits → funding → EPC → offtake → construction → commissioning
NowPermits
NextFunding
NextEPC
NowOfftake
NextConstruction
NextCommissioning
Gate
Status
Why it matters
● Permits
In progress
Approvals path to FID
○ Funding
Open
Project finance package
○ EPC
Open
Schedule and capex control
● Offtake
In progress
Product / customer path
○ Construction
Open
Physical de-risking
○ Commissioning
Open
Operating proof / first cash
Capital stackSources for the development path
Source
A$m
Cash
A$17.6m

Expansion beyond Stage may still require project-level or partner capital.

Cash flow inflectionPath to self-funding
2026Current cash burn
2027Commissioning
2027 H2First sales
2028Operating cash flow
2029+Fund Stage
Valuation bridgeFrom study NAV to target PPS
=
Risk-adjusted equity value
A$68.2m
house target case
=
Target
A$0.069
÷ 993m sh
Target disciplineWhy we only recognise that share of value today
Question
Answer
Market metric
target value construction is the anchor; producer multiples are only relevant after production or cash flow evidence.
Where it sits today
A$159m market cap -> A$68.2m target equity (-57%).
Comparator basis
No like-for-like resource peer denominator is available. The resource line is an implied-target reconciliation, not peer validation; it neither proves nor disproves the accepted valuation.
Why not the top case
Target remains below blue-sky A$89.9m / A$0.091. We stop here because the next technical, permitting or operating proof point has not yet landed. Higher credit needs the next technical, permitting or operating proof point.
Binding constraints
the next technical, permitting or operating proof point has not yet landed
Price rangeWhere the equity story lands
PER-SHARE OUTCOME · LOG SCALESPOT A$0.160TARGETA$0.069
A$68.2m equity value
BLUE SKYA$0.091
A$89.9m equity value
Market snapshot A$0.160 · uplift vs point-in-time quote
Scenario
Price / sh
Equity
vs Snapshot
Target
A$0.069
A$68.2m
-57%
Blue sky
A$0.091
A$89.9m
-43%

Market discount drivers: funding, execution, commodity.

Online modelOpen the full valuation detail online

The print page keeps the decision table readable. The portal carries the full stage stack, assumptions, sensitivity, funding mechanics and peer context.

View valuation detail ↗
Valuation & fundingInvestHouse
Sky Metals LtdResearch ReportInvestHouse Research
SKY : ASXPAGE 06 / 10
06What Backs The Number

Evidence & execution

Evidence strengthWhat is proven versus still speculative in the house target
Thesis leg
Evidence status
Value
Weight
Known drilled inventory
Proven intercept geometry
Not yet modelled
Evidence case
Potential inventory
Continuity / width still open
Growth envelope
Speculative until wider envelopes close
Blue sky
System-scale case
Success case
Not in evidence case
Proof pointsVisible proof and the next valuation test
Balance sheetA$17.6m cash context Known
Next prooffunding terms if work accelerates
Evidence statusWhat is established, supported by current evidence, and still needs proof
Area
Evidence status
Read-through
Lead asset quality
PROVEN
Strong asset/value anchor
Partner capital / funding
SUPPORTED
Main valuation discount
Valuation evidence
PROVEN
Asymmetry is visible
Technical and contract proof
SUPPORTED
Needs next technical proof
Logistics and infrastructure
SUPPORTED
Acceptable, with permitting work
Study-to-funding delivery
SUPPORTED
Needs milestone delivery
PFS and catalyst timing
SUPPORTED
Timing is visible but not immediate
Evidence & executionInvestHouse
Sky Metals LtdResearch ReportInvestHouse Research
SKY : ASXPAGE 07 / 10
07Institutional Cross-Check

Model & peer context

Market Cap
A$159m
Last Price
A$0.160
Cash
A$17.6m
Net Cash
A$17.6m
House assumptionsKey model inputs behind the valuation
2026
$42,000
2027
$40,000
LT
$35,000
Operating assumptions behind the model
Study
Prod tpa
Opex/t
NPV₁₀ (post-tax)
IRR
Capex
Tallebung Pre-Feasibility Study
Source filing
—
—
A$309m
57.2%
A$139m
Tallebung Tin-Tungsten-Silver Project PFS Presentation
Source filing
—
—
A$438m
—
A$139m

8% discount · 7.25 yr mine life · 1.5 yr payback · Aug 2026 · PFS

8% discount · 7.3 yr mine life · 1.5 yr payback · Aug 2026 · PFS

Model & peer contextInvestHouse
Sky Metals LtdResearch ReportInvestHouse Research
SKY : ASXPAGE 08 / 10
08What Moves NPV

Sensitivity analysis

Sensitivity AnalysisStudy-disclosed NPV response to price and cost movements · PFS · Tallebung Project
Sensitivity Analysis (AUD m) NPV8 After Tax
Variable
-33%
-30%
-25%
-17%
-13%
Base Case
+11%
+13%
+24%
+25%
+33%
+50%
+67%
+80%
+105%
tinPrice
—
—
—
325
—
438
514
—
—
611
665
—
—
—
—
tungstenPrice
325
—
—
—
—
438
—
—
—
—
552
—
665
—
795
silverPrice
—
405
—
—
—
438
—
—
465
—
—
494
—
527
—
discountRate
—
—
482
—
460
438
—
418
—
399
—
—
—
—
—

Values are the study's published NPV outcomes at each stress, not a house re-run. Use them to see which lever breaks the project economics first.

Sensitivity analysisInvestHouse
Sky Metals LtdResearch ReportInvestHouse Research
SKY : ASXPAGE 09 / 10
09

Leadership & Register

RegistermissingBoardas at 02 Sept 2026Valuation04 Sept 2026
Board & Key PersonnelComposition
01
Norman Alfred SeckoldChair
Chairman with more than 40 years of natural-resources management experience; also chairs Alpha HPA, Nickel Industries and Fulcrum Lithium.
02
Oliver DaviesManaging Director
Joined Sky Metals as a geologist in 2019, became CEO in 2022 and Managing Director in September 2024; has exploration experience with Evolution Mining and Alkane Resources.
03
Scott ToddExecutive Director
Executive Director responsible for project development; qualified mining engineer with senior leadership experience at PYBAR Mining Services, Mitsubishi Development and Thiess.
04
Richard Grant Manners HillNon-Executive Director
Geologist and solicitor with more than 25 years of resources-sector experience; chairman of New World Resources and Accelerate Resources.
05
Rimas KairaitisNon-Executive Director
Minerals-industry executive with more than 25 years of experience in exploration, project development, mineral processing and company management.
+1 additional people in source records
Bottom line
Board composition is a resource-development check; watch whether management converts inventory and metallurgy into study-grade economics before committing development capital.
Leadership & RegisterInvestHouse
Sky Metals LtdResearch ReportInvestHouse Research
SKY : ASXPAGE 10 / 10
Important Disclosures & Disclaimer

Important disclosures
and disclaimer

General information only. Not personal advice. Readers should assess suitability and seek licensed advice where appropriate.

Publisher and Regulatory Status
This research has been prepared and published by InvestHouse Financial Services Pty Ltd (ACN 669 520 174). InvestHouse Financial Services Pty Ltd is a Corporate Authorised Representative (No. 001304496) of Point Capital Group Pty Ltd (ABN 41 625 931 900), holder of Australian Financial Services Licence No. 518031. The views, opinions, recommendations, valuations, and price targets expressed in this research are those of InvestHouse and the identified author(s).
General Information Only
This document is supplied solely for information. Any financial advice contained in it is general only and has been prepared without reference to any person's objectives, financial situation or needs. Investors should assess the appropriateness of the information in light of their own circumstances and, where appropriate, seek advice from a licensed financial adviser before acting on it.
Nature of the Research
The views expressed in this report reflect the opinions of the author(s) as at the date of publication and are based on publicly available information believed to be reliable at the time of writing. Forecasts, estimates, valuations, price targets, and forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain and subject to change without notice. This report does not constitute an offer or invitation to purchase securities and should not be relied upon in connection with any contract or commitment.
Conflicts of Interest
InvestHouse Financial Services Pty Ltd, its related entities, directors, officers, employees, or associates may have provided, may currently provide, or may in the future provide corporate advisory, capital markets, investor relations, media, consulting, or other commercial services to companies mentioned in this report. They may also trade in securities that are the subject of this report and may earn brokerage, commissions, fees, or other benefits in connection with recommendations or dealings by clients in those securities. Some representatives may be remunerated wholly or partly by commission.
Analyst Certification
Each analyst or author responsible for this report certifies that the final published views, opinions, valuations, and price targets accurately reflect their personal, independent, and objective assessment of the securities or issuers discussed. No part of their compensation was, is, or will be directly or indirectly related to the specific recommendations, opinions, valuations, or price targets expressed in this report.
Research Policy and FSG
InvestHouse Financial Services Pty Ltd maintains internal arrangements designed to manage research independence, conflicts of interest, and separation between research, advisory, corporate, and capital markets activities. For further information, refer to the current Financial Services Guide and Research Independence Policy.
No Warranty or Liability
While this report is based on sources considered reliable, InvestHouse Financial Services Pty Ltd has not independently verified all information contained in this document and does not represent, warrant, or guarantee, expressly or impliedly, that it is complete or accurate. InvestHouse Financial Services Pty Ltd accepts no responsibility to update any advice, views, opinions, or recommendations or to correct any error or omission that becomes apparent after publication.
Jurisdiction and Distribution
This document is not directed to, or intended for distribution to or use by, any person or entity in any locality, state, country, or jurisdiction where distribution, publication, availability, or use would be contrary to law or regulation, or would subject InvestHouse Financial Services Pty Ltd to any registration or licensing requirement. Specific jurisdictional restrictions may apply outside Australia.
Copyright and Use
© 2026 InvestHouse Financial Services Pty Ltd. All rights reserved. All material presented in this document, unless specifically indicated otherwise, is under copyright to InvestHouse Financial Services Pty Ltd. This document is a private communication disseminated by InvestHouse Financial Services Pty Ltd and must not be altered, transmitted, copied, distributed, or used by any other party without its prior written consent.
AI-Assisted Research and Analyst Review
InvestHouse Research uses a combined AI and analyst-review pathway. AI tools may assist with data extraction, summarisation, drafting, modelling support, editing, and report structuring. The final report is reviewed by an analyst or author before publication, but AI-assisted workflows and source data may still contain errors, omissions, or inaccuracies. Readers should independently verify all material information.
By accessing this report, you acknowledge these disclosures · For distribution only where lawful · InvestHouse Research