01 / 11
Download PDF
InvestHouse Research
Research subjectSky Metals LtdSKY:ASX
Report cycleQ2 CY26 UPDATEAs at 04 Sept 2026
Report01/ 11

Tallebung’s shallow extensions make repeat assays the valuation hinge

Sky Metals develops the Tallebung tin-tungsten-silver project, with multi-rig assays next to test resource continuity and scale.

The drill database is the immediate test

The market is pricing Sky Metals as though Tallebung’s resource scale and development economics are already investable. The 10 August 2026 PFS gives that view a credible project frame, with a 3Mtpa open-cut operation, a 7.3-year initial mine life, A$309m post-tax NPV and A$138.8m pre-production capital. The immediate question is narrower: whether current drilling establishes the continuity and scale needed to support those assumptions.

PFS economics improve the frame, not the proof The PFS materially improves the consequence of successful drilling. Management targets average annual production of 2,040t of tin, 31,700 mtu of tungsten trioxide and 315koz of silver, with payback targeted within 17 months. If the resource and processing assumptions survive the next study and approvals sequence, investors can begin underwriting a project capable of generating operating cash flow rather than only exploration newsflow.

The market capitalisation of A$213.4m indicates that resource growth, the PFS case and portfolio assets are already receiving substantial credit. We believe the market is paying for more geological continuity than the current drill record conclusively establishes.

Evidence required for a lower discount

  • Funding consequence: The June 2026 quarter ended with A$17.59m cash and an estimated 5.1 quarters of funding at the reported burn rate, supporting the current programme.

What changes our view

  • We would reduce conviction if drilling expands the headline footprint but fails to establish connected mineralised envelopes, or if the resource-definition programme is deferred as capital is redirected.
  • Dominant failure mode: Geological continuity and resource conversion break the thesis. A larger headline inventory without mineable geometry would leave the PFS as long-term development optionality, while successful resource definition would move Tallebung towards a financeable project case.
Verified and compiled byIvan Tchourilov02 Aug 2026

The mining valuation is withheld because the current engine output has not passed the publication gate.

General information only: This report is general in nature and has been prepared without taking into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Consider whether it is appropriate for you and seek licensed advice where required.

This report has not been commissioned or paid for by the company and may be AI-assisted. See Important Disclosures for publisher, conflicts, research policy and distribution information.

© 2026 InvestHouse Financial Services Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.

Cover · Investment SummaryInvestHouse
Sky Metals LtdFY2026 Research ReportInvestHouse Research
SKY : ASXPAGE 02 / 11
Section Lens
02

June quarter: the drilling bridge stayed funded

Quarterly snapshot
Last four reported quarters
CASH A$17.6M · BURN A$3.5M/QTRQ1Q2Q3Q4Q5Q6Q7Q8FINANCING GATE · 5.0 QTRSEXPLORATION A$2.9M · ADMIN A$0.4M
Dec 25Open
Mar 26Open
June 26Open
Cash
A$4.70m
A$20.6m
A$17.6m
Receipts
A$39k
A$3.0k
Burn / OCF
A$0.00m
A$2.87m
A$3.54m
Exploration
A$1.40m
A$2.34m
A$2.87m
Admin
A$54k
A$0.32m
A$0.36m
Runway
Self-funded
7.2q
5.0q

Latest reported runway is 5.0 quarters at current burn.

Exploration and evaluation remained the main use of funds, allowing Sky Metals to continue its planned Tallebung drilling without a disclosed interruption. The quarter therefore supported programme continuity, while development funding remained unresolved.

Tallebung expanded beyond the MRE cut-off

TBRC436–TBRC439 identified shallow tin-tungsten-silver mineralisation outside the resource cut-off. The updated Tallebung MRE was released on 13 July 2026, after quarter end, so these results are not yet included in the resource. The company also submitted the Tallebung Scoping Report and received SEARs, moving the project into the NSW State Significant Development EIS phase. That advances approvals without changing the status of the new drilling results.

Doradilla remains an exploration option

Doradilla’s 10–15Mt Exploration Target at 6.87cc–0.42% Sn is conceptual and non-JORC. It spans 2.5km of a corridor exceeding 10km and remains contingent on drilling; it cannot be treated as a Mineral Resource or mine inventory. The quarter added exploration optionality, but neither Doradilla nor Tallebung’s new zone had converted into resource-backed value.

June quarter: the drilling bridge stayed funded · Section LensInvestHouse
Sky Metals LtdFY2026 Research ReportInvestHouse Research
SKY : ASXPAGE 03 / 11
Section Lens
03

Tallebung’s PFS needs a stronger geological foundation

Lead asset
Developer underwriting anchor
Company stageDeveloper
Current gateFunding, permits and construction execution
Study anchorPFSTallebung Project
Funding burdenA$139m0% dilution in the model

The study provides a development frame, but the geological confidence required for an investable mine plan remains incomplete.

The PFS is economic on management assumptions

The PFS targets annual production of 2,040t of tin, 31,700 mtu of tungsten trioxide and 315koz of silver over 7.3 years, with approximately A$438m pre-tax NPV8 and a 69% pre-tax IRR. Its assumptions are US$45,000/t tin, US$1,500/mtu tungsten trioxide and US$50/g silver. The production target comprises 66% Measured and Indicated and 34% Inferred Resources, with no Ore Reserve declared; the economics therefore depend on successful resource conversion.

Continuity and concentrate quality remain to prove

TBRC471 and TBRC472 expanded the shallow footprint outside the July 2026 MRE.

  1. 01TBRC471 returned 29m at 0.31% Sn and 0.04% W from 27m, including 2m at 1.62% Sn, 0.08% W and 47.8g/t Ag.
  2. 02TBRC472 returned 26m at 0.27% Sn, 0.07% W and 23.3g/t Ag, supporting footprint growth but not continuity between sections.
  3. 03Resource-definition drilling must establish consistent geometry, true width and mineable continuity between adjacent zones.
  4. 04Bulk-sample work is testing ore sorting, concentration and marketable tin concentrates, which remains PFS-level engineering and design validation rather than proof of a commercial flowsheet.

The shallow geometry and multi-metal intersections support further development consideration, but connected resource continuity, representative metallurgy and integrated design remain the gates to converting the PFS into a mine plan.

Tallebung’s PFS needs a stronger geological foundation · Section LensInvestHouse
Sky Metals LtdFY2026 Research ReportInvestHouse Research
SKY : ASXPAGE 04 / 11
Section Lens
04

From assays to a resource decision

Next proof
Stage-native catalyst
Current gateFunding, permits and construction execution
Next proofBinding finance and physical delivery milestones
Value at stake
Published valuation range
PER-SHARE OUTCOME · LOG SCALESPOT A$0.185FAIRA$0.169
Intrinsic resource case
TARGETA$0.189
House anchor
BLUE SKYA$0.261
Full-success, diluted
House targetA$0.189A$187m equity value

Post-assay interpretation remains the next resource-definition decision.

Conversion is the risk

The most informative near-term outcome is recurring assay flow, not the mid-2028 first-production target. The current exploration programme is funded, while resource definition and mine development remain subsequent capital decisions. Approval slippage, non-repeatable metallurgy and inability to fund the next stage would compound the downside.

From assays to a resource decision · Section LensInvestHouse
Sky Metals LtdFY2026 Research ReportInvestHouse Research
SKY : ASXPAGE 05 / 11
Section Lens
05

Selective capital markets raise the value of near-term proof

The Federal Reserve’s target range was 3.50%–3.75% on 18 March 2026; positive real rates and elevated yields are limiting indiscriminate small-cap funding. Over the next 12–24 months, capital should favour projects with specific geological proof over commodity exposure alone.

Tin-cycle evidence is incomplete

Tin supports the strategic case for an Australian source, but the supplied dataset contains no verified current US$ tin price, inventory position, new-supply schedule, surplus/deficit estimate or contracting flows. A long-term supply-demand view therefore cannot be published from this evidence. Tallebung’s near-term geological progress, rather than an assumed tin-price cycle, remains the relevant variable.

Funding read-through for SKY

SKY had cash at quarter end and no available financing facilities reported. The 12 February 2026 A$20.5m placement demonstrates a prior open funding window, but not the terms available for later resource-definition or development capital. In this regime, a clearer Tallebung evidence package is more likely to improve access to the next funding step than tin exposure alone, while isolated results would leave access more dependent on market conditions.

  1. 01Capital signal: Placement demand, discount and strategic or project-level interest will indicate whether the geological package is financeable.
  2. 02Underwriting consequence: Funding conditions support the current programme but do not remove the risk attached to later capital requirements.
Selective capital markets raise the value of near-term proof · Section LensInvestHouse
Sky Metals LtdFY2026 Research ReportInvestHouse Research
SKY : ASXPAGE 06 / 11
06Decision Variables

Valuation & funding

Can the company fund the next value gate on acceptable terms?

SOTP MINING PORTFOLIOPFSDCF
Market Cap
A$0
Last Price
A$0.185
Cash
A$17.6m
Net Cash
A$17.6m
Development ScorecardDeveloper path: permits → funding → EPC → offtake → construction → commissioning
NowPermits
NextFunding
NowEPC
NowOfftake
NextConstruction
NextCommissioning
Build A$139m
Cash on hand 0%Still to fund 100%
Gate
Status
Why it matters
● Permits
In progress
Approvals path to FID
○ Funding
Open
A$139m still to fund
● EPC
In progress
Schedule and capex control
● Offtake
In progress
Product / customer path
○ Construction
Open
Physical de-risking
○ Commissioning
Open
Operating proof / first cash
Capital stackIllustrative funding structure
Use / source
A$m
Build capex required
A$139m
Cash applied
A$17.6m
Project debt
TBD
Base equity requirement
A$139m
Construction contingency / interest buffer
A$13.9m
Strategic / offtake capital
TBD
Total illustrated equity funding
A$153m
Identified funding
A$170m

Illustrative funding structure reconciles to build capex; debt, equity and strategic/offtake legs remain assumptions until committed. Base equity requirement is A$139m; the A$153m total illustrated raise includes A$13.9m for construction contingency / interest.

Cash flow inflectionPath to self-funding
2026Current cash burn
2027Commissioning
2027 H2First sales
2028Operating cash flow
2029+Fund Tallebung Pre-Feasibility Study
Valuation bridgeFrom option value to the target price
Valued
Resource
A$283m
Valued
Risk adjustment
+
A$204m
Valued
Funding / dilution haircut
+
A$139m
Cash
Cash
+
A$17.6m
House
House value
=
A$96.9m
Tallebung Pre-Feasibility StudyA$142m @ 50%

Green components are already supported by evidence; amber and grey components need revenue, margin, ownership or milestone proof before they deserve more value.

Target disciplineWhy we only recognise that share of value today
Question
Answer
Market metric
SOTP MINING PORTFOLIO is the anchor; producer multiples are only relevant after production or cash flow evidence.
Where it sits today
A$167m target equity value.
Comparator basis
No like-for-like resource peer denominator is available. The resource line is an implied-target reconciliation, not peer validation; it neither proves nor disproves the accepted valuation.
Why not the top case
We only recognise 50% of study / operating value today (blue-sky 85%) because project funding for the remaining A$139m gap is not yet locked; construction or commissioning has not yet delivered operating proof; equity dilution into first cash remains uncertain. Higher credit needs funding terms for the remaining A$139m gap.
Binding constraints
project funding for the remaining A$139m gap is not yet locked
construction or commissioning has not yet delivered operating proof
equity dilution into first cash remains uncertain
Price rangeWhere the equity story lands
PER-SHARE OUTCOME · LOG SCALESPOT A$0.185BEARA$0.071
A$70.1m equity value
BLUE SKYA$0.261
A$258m equity value
Market snapshot A$0.185 · uplift vs point-in-time quote
Scenario
Price / sh
Equity
vs Snapshot
Bear
A$0.071
A$70.1m
-62%
Target
A$142m
Blue sky
A$0.261
A$258m
+41%

The technical anchor is evidence-backed study NPV, but the credited value reflects how much of that study the market prices in today: the tape credits only part of the headline until funding, copper and gold pricing, permits, and execution de-risk.

Development ScorecardDeveloper path: permits → funding → EPC → offtake → construction → commissioning
NowPermits
NextFunding
NowEPC
NowOfftake
NextConstruction
NextCommissioning
Build A$139m
Cash on hand 0%Still to fund 100%
Gate
Status
Why it matters
● Permits
In progress
Approvals path to FID
○ Funding
Open
A$139m still to fund
● EPC
In progress
Schedule and capex control
● Offtake
In progress
Product / customer path
○ Construction
Open
Physical de-risking
○ Commissioning
Open
Operating proof / first cash
Capital stackIllustrative funding structure
Use / source
A$m
Build capex required
A$139m
Cash applied
A$17.6m
Project debt
TBD
Base equity requirement
A$139m
Construction contingency / interest buffer
A$13.9m
Strategic / offtake capital
TBD
Total illustrated equity funding
A$153m
Identified funding
A$170m

Illustrative funding structure reconciles to build capex; debt, equity and strategic/offtake legs remain assumptions until committed. Base equity requirement is A$139m; the A$153m total illustrated raise includes A$13.9m for construction contingency / interest.

Cash flow inflectionPath to self-funding
2026Current cash burn
2027Commissioning
2027 H2First sales
2028Operating cash flow
2029+Fund Tallebung Pre-Feasibility Study
Valuation bridgeFrom option value to the target price
Valued
Resource
A$283m
Valued
Risk adjustment
+
A$204m
Valued
Funding / dilution haircut
+
A$139m
Cash
Cash
+
A$17.6m
House
House value
=
A$96.9m
Tallebung Pre-Feasibility StudyA$142m @ 50%

Green components are already supported by evidence; amber and grey components need revenue, margin, ownership or milestone proof before they deserve more value.

Target disciplineWhy we only recognise that share of value today
Question
Answer
Market metric
SOTP MINING PORTFOLIO is the anchor; producer multiples are only relevant after production or cash flow evidence.
Where it sits today
A$167m target equity value.
Comparator basis
No like-for-like resource peer denominator is available. The resource line is an implied-target reconciliation, not peer validation; it neither proves nor disproves the accepted valuation.
Why not the top case
We only recognise 50% of study / operating value today (blue-sky 85%) because project funding for the remaining A$139m gap is not yet locked; construction or commissioning has not yet delivered operating proof; equity dilution into first cash remains uncertain. Higher credit needs funding terms for the remaining A$139m gap.
Binding constraints
project funding for the remaining A$139m gap is not yet locked
construction or commissioning has not yet delivered operating proof
equity dilution into first cash remains uncertain
Price rangeWhere the equity story lands
PER-SHARE OUTCOME · LOG SCALESPOT A$0.185BEARA$0.071
A$70.1m equity value
BLUE SKYA$0.261
A$258m equity value
Market snapshot A$0.185 · uplift vs point-in-time quote
Scenario
Price / sh
Equity
vs Snapshot
Bear
A$0.071
A$70.1m
-62%
Target
A$142m
Blue sky
A$0.261
A$258m
+41%

The technical anchor is evidence-backed study NPV, but the credited value reflects how much of that study the market prices in today: the tape credits only part of the headline until funding, copper and gold pricing, permits, and execution de-risk.

Online modelOpen the full valuation detail online

The print page keeps the decision table readable. The portal carries the full stage stack, assumptions, sensitivity, funding mechanics and peer context.

View valuation detail
Valuation & fundingInvestHouse
Sky Metals LtdFY2026 Research ReportInvestHouse Research
SKY : ASXPAGE 07 / 11
07What Backs The Number

Evidence & execution

SOTP MINING PORTFOLIOPFSDCF
Evidence strengthWhat is proven versus still speculative in the house target

The technical anchor is evidence-backed study NPV, but the credited value reflects how much of that study the market prices in today: the tape credits only part of the headline until funding, copper and gold pricing, permits, and execution de-risk.

Thesis leg
Evidence status
Value
Weight
Known drilled inventory
Proven intercept geometry
Not yet modelled
Evidence case
Potential inventory
Continuity / width still open
Growth envelope
Speculative until wider envelopes close
Blue sky
System-scale case
Success case
Not in evidence case
Proof pointsVisible proof and the next valuation test
Balance sheetA$17.6m cash context Known
Next prooffunding terms if work accelerates
Evidence statusWhat is established, supported by current evidence, and still needs proof
Area
Evidence status
Read-through
Lead asset quality
PROVEN
Strong asset/value anchor
Partner capital / funding
SUPPORTED
Main valuation discount
Valuation evidence
PROVEN
Asymmetry is visible
Technical and contract proof
SUPPORTED
Needs next technical proof
Permits and approvals
SUPPORTED
Acceptable, with permitting work
Study-to-funding delivery
SUPPORTED
Needs milestone delivery
PFS and catalyst timing
SUPPORTED
Timing is visible but not immediate
Evidence & executionInvestHouse
Sky Metals LtdFY2026 Research ReportInvestHouse Research
SKY : ASXPAGE 08 / 11
08Institutional Cross-Check

Model & peer context

Market Cap
A$0
Last Price
A$0.185
Cash
A$17.6m
Net Cash
A$17.6m
House assumptionsKey model inputs behind the valuation
2026
$42,000
2027
$40,000
LT
$35,000
Per-stage operating assumptions
Stage
Throughput
Capex
Opex /t
Tallebung Pre-Feasibility Study
A$139m
Model & peer contextInvestHouse
Sky Metals LtdFY2026 Research ReportInvestHouse Research
SKY : ASXPAGE 09 / 11
09What Moves NPV

Sensitivity analysis

Sensitivity AnalysisStudy-disclosed NPV response to price and cost movements · PFS · Tallebung Project
Sensitivity Analysis (AUD m) NPV8 After Tax
Variable
-33%
-30%
-25%
-17%
-13%
Base Case
+11%
+13%
+24%
+25%
+33%
+50%
+67%
+80%
+105%
tinPrice
325
438
514
611
665
tungstenPrice
325
438
552
665
795
silverPrice
405
438
465
494
527
discountRate
482
460
438
418
399

Values are the study's published NPV outcomes at each stress, not a house re-run. Use them to see which lever breaks the project economics first.

Sensitivity analysisInvestHouse
Sky Metals LtdFY2026 Research ReportInvestHouse Research
SKY : ASXPAGE 10 / 11
10

Leadership & Register

RegistermissingBoardas at 02 Sept 2026Peersempty
Board & Key PersonnelComposition
01
Norman Alfred SeckoldChair
Chairman with more than 40 years of natural-resources management experience; also chairs Alpha HPA, Nickel Industries and Fulcrum Lithium.
02
Oliver DaviesManaging Director
Joined Sky Metals as a geologist in 2019, became CEO in 2022 and Managing Director in September 2024; has exploration experience with Evolution Mining and Alkane Resources.
03
Scott ToddExecutive Director
Executive Director responsible for project development; qualified mining engineer with senior leadership experience at PYBAR Mining Services, Mitsubishi Development and Thiess.
04
Richard Grant Manners HillNon-Executive Director
Geologist and solicitor with more than 25 years of resources-sector experience; chairman of New World Resources and Accelerate Resources.
05
Rimas KairaitisNon-Executive Director
Minerals-industry executive with more than 25 years of experience in exploration, project development, mineral processing and company management.
+1 additional people in source records
Bottom line
Board composition is a resource-development check; watch whether management converts inventory and metallurgy into study-grade economics before committing development capital.
Leadership & RegisterInvestHouse
Sky Metals LtdFY2026 Research ReportInvestHouse Research
SKY : ASXPAGE 11 / 11
Important Disclosures & Disclaimer

Important disclosures
and disclaimer

General information only. Not personal advice. Readers should assess suitability and seek licensed advice where appropriate.

Publisher and Regulatory Status
This research has been prepared and published by InvestHouse Financial Services Pty Ltd (ACN 669 520 174). InvestHouse Financial Services Pty Ltd is a Corporate Authorised Representative (No. 001304496) of Point Capital Group Pty Ltd (ABN 41 625 931 900), holder of Australian Financial Services Licence No. 518031. The views, opinions, recommendations, valuations, and price targets expressed in this research are those of InvestHouse and the identified author(s).
General Information Only
This document is supplied solely for information. Any financial advice contained in it is general only and has been prepared without reference to any person's objectives, financial situation or needs. Investors should assess the appropriateness of the information in light of their own circumstances and, where appropriate, seek advice from a licensed financial adviser before acting on it.
Nature of the Research
The views expressed in this report reflect the opinions of the author(s) as at the date of publication and are based on publicly available information believed to be reliable at the time of writing. Forecasts, estimates, valuations, price targets, and forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain and subject to change without notice. This report does not constitute an offer or invitation to purchase securities and should not be relied upon in connection with any contract or commitment.
Conflicts of Interest
InvestHouse Financial Services Pty Ltd, its related entities, directors, officers, employees, or associates may have provided, may currently provide, or may in the future provide corporate advisory, capital markets, investor relations, media, consulting, or other commercial services to companies mentioned in this report. They may also trade in securities that are the subject of this report and may earn brokerage, commissions, fees, or other benefits in connection with recommendations or dealings by clients in those securities. Some representatives may be remunerated wholly or partly by commission.
Analyst Certification
Each analyst or author responsible for this report certifies that the final published views, opinions, valuations, and price targets accurately reflect their personal, independent, and objective assessment of the securities or issuers discussed. No part of their compensation was, is, or will be directly or indirectly related to the specific recommendations, opinions, valuations, or price targets expressed in this report.
Research Policy and FSG
InvestHouse Financial Services Pty Ltd maintains internal arrangements designed to manage research independence, conflicts of interest, and separation between research, advisory, corporate, and capital markets activities. For further information, refer to the current Financial Services Guide and Research Independence Policy.
No Warranty or Liability
While this report is based on sources considered reliable, InvestHouse Financial Services Pty Ltd has not independently verified all information contained in this document and does not represent, warrant, or guarantee, expressly or impliedly, that it is complete or accurate. InvestHouse Financial Services Pty Ltd accepts no responsibility to update any advice, views, opinions, or recommendations or to correct any error or omission that becomes apparent after publication.
Jurisdiction and Distribution
This document is not directed to, or intended for distribution to or use by, any person or entity in any locality, state, country, or jurisdiction where distribution, publication, availability, or use would be contrary to law or regulation, or would subject InvestHouse Financial Services Pty Ltd to any registration or licensing requirement. Specific jurisdictional restrictions may apply outside Australia.
Copyright and Use
© 2026 InvestHouse Financial Services Pty Ltd. All rights reserved. All material presented in this document, unless specifically indicated otherwise, is under copyright to InvestHouse Financial Services Pty Ltd. This document is a private communication disseminated by InvestHouse Financial Services Pty Ltd and must not be altered, transmitted, copied, distributed, or used by any other party without its prior written consent.
AI-Assisted Research and Analyst Review
InvestHouse Research uses a combined AI and analyst-review pathway. AI tools may assist with data extraction, summarisation, drafting, modelling support, editing, and report structuring. The final report is reviewed by an analyst or author before publication, but AI-assisted workflows and source data may still contain errors, omissions, or inaccuracies. Readers should independently verify all material information.
By accessing this report, you acknowledge these disclosures · For distribution only where lawful · InvestHouse Research